(Homily for the Solemnity of the Corpus Christi Year C)
Today the
Holy Mother Church celebrates one of her most sublime Mysteries: the Eucharist, the Solemnity of the Corpus
Christi, the Solemnity that recalls the Mystery of the real presence of
Christ in Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Sacrament of the Holy
Eucharist. The aim of this solemnity is
three-fold: first, it serves as an invitation for us to be always conscious of
the greatness of this Gift; second, to make our faith always alive and
convinced in It; third, to reawaken in us the sensibility always to render
gratitude to Jesus who instituted It, “the very night he was to be betrayed”,
as a sign of His extreme and endless
love for us. The Eucharist is the
perpetuation of both his Love and Presence. It is the Sacrament of Christ’s extreme love for humanity. It is a sign of his continuous
Incarnation in human history. In the words of
Giovanni Vannucci, “man is the only creature that has God in his blood”, we have in us a divine chromosome, for
Jesus dwells in us!
The word Eucharist comes from
the Greek word “eucharistia” which is a translation of the Hebrew word “berakah”
and they all stand to signify thanksgiving or praise to God for his wonderful
deeds. This Sacrament therefore, reminds us of
the Jewish religious tradition of Berakah, which has to do with blessing, thanksgiving and praise to God for
the wonders he has wrought. The readings
of this great Solemnity are replete with sacrificial symbolisms, as such
references to blood and sacrifice abound. Each time we celebrate the
solemnity of the Body and Blood of Christ, we often tend to lay much emphasis
on the Body, in fact, it is even suggestive in the title “Corpus Christi”. We do
not often talk about the blood, which is at the heart of this Sacrament and the
most eloquent symbol of his self-donation. Indeed, the second reading “is
dripping in blood” to say it with Bishop Robert Baron. Blood is life, to offer one’s blood is to offer one’s
life. This is what Jesus did, he offered his life Blood.
Going
through history lane, we remember that in the Old Jewish tradition, when the
family gather for the Passover Meal, it was prescribed that the last born of
the house, asks a question to the Father of the family, thus: What does this ritual mean? This was
the question that someone (maybe John that was the youngest apostle) could have
directed to Jesus, the evening they were at table for the Last Super. Maybe in
response, Jesus might have explained to them how the whole celebration from the
night of the Exodus on, with the killing of the lamb and the Passover Meal,
were not but a figure and a prophecy of Him; the Lamb of God (cf. Gen. 22:7; Jn. 1:29), that has to
be slaughtered in order to take away the sins of the world, and to be food and
drink for his friends. Indeed, “Christ loved us and handed himself over to us
as an offering and a sweet-smelling sacrifice to God” (Eph. 5:2). Similarly, the same question can situate us well into
the context of our present gathering, thus, let us ask ourselves: What is the meaning of this ritual? Not
because we do not know what we are about to do or the essence of our
celebration, but for the Lord to explain it to us again, through his Word and
Sacrament, always for a more profound
understanding. No doubt, to that question the readings of today have much in
stock for us.
The first reading (Gen. 14:18-20) we are presented with
the figure of Melchizedek the priest of the Old Testament, and he is like a torch light that points to the
reality of Jesus. But for us to understand the real import of the message
we cannot but make a backward step into the historical context surrounding the
passage. The context that precedes the passage was a war between some Kings in
the region where Abraham’s nephew: Lot was residing. In the course of that war
Lot was captured and taken to prison. On hearing this, Abraham gathered about
three hundred men, who defeated the enemies and rescued Lot and his possessions
(cf. Gen. 14:12-16). While returning, Abraham met Melchizedek the King of Salem
who brought bread and wine and blessed Abraham. Indeed, here we see a glaring difference between him and the priests of the Old
Covenant who offered blood of sacrificed animals, while he offered bread and
wine. The author of the Letter to the Hebrews says: “he is like the Son of
God” (Heb. 7:3). That is to say, that through Melchizedek we
catch a glimpse already in the Old order of Jesus. Melchizedek is a priest
of old and Jesus is the high priest of the New Testament. Our response to the
psalm bears witness to it: “You are a priest forever according to the order of
Melchizedek” (Ps.110:4). Melchizedek
brought bread and wine, which is a prefiguration of the Eucharist that Jesus
would offer in a personified manner. Similarly, in the gestures of the
Priest of Salem who offered bread and wine, the Church sees a prefiguration of
her own offering (CCC 1333). The victory and rescue of Lot by Abraham
symbolizes the Lord’s victory over our enemies and our rescue too.
Melchizedek brought out bread
and blessed Abraham. In the Old Testament, bread and wine is a sign of blessing
(he blessed Abraham), a sign of gratitude (blessed be God who has delivered
your enemies in your hands) because it calls to mind the wonders God has
wrought. In the Exodus 16, the
Israelites received manner and ate. Indeed, we can see a sort of progression in
the bread and wine of the Old Testament and the body and blood of Christ of the
New Testament, we can say that,
Melchizedek brought the bread and wine, but Jesus did the real offering (of
himself). Melchizedek’s offering of bread and wine prefigures Christ’s offering
of bread and wine, not just bread and wine, but his body and blood, HIS LIFE.
In the Gospel passage (Lk. 9:11-17) Jesus performed a miracle
of loaves, feeding five thousand men from only five loaves and two fish. This miracle in turn prefigures the
greatest miracle of the New Testament: The Eucharist. The apostles adopted
a hostile solution to the urgency of the hunger of this crowd. They went to
Jesus and said: “send the crowd away”. But Jesus never sent anybody away. He
helped the apostles to understand that the first step of this miracle is
sharing and not multiplication, for Jesus retorted, “You give them something to
eat”. The verb ‘to give’, is the action word that vehicle the miracle. In the
Gospel the verb ‘to love’ is always translated with another concrete verb ‘to
give’, for instance: “For God so loved the world, that He gave his only
begotten Son” (Jn. 3:15). The
apostles had only five loaves, which means one loaf for one thousand men, and
in human calculation it seemed impossible. However,
in God’s calculation, the miracle of that night, was that the small piece of
bread shared became sufficient for all.
The second reading (1Cor. 11:23-26) describes the event of
the last supper. This as we have it from St. Paul is the oldest account of the
Last Supper. He says: “this is my body”, “this chalice is the new covenant in
my Blood”. He did not say this
represents my body or my blood. Little wonder, the Catholic doctrine
teaches about Transubstantiation
(that is while maintaining the appearance of bread and wine, the substances of
bread and wine are transformed), inter alia. Again
to our earlier question: What does this ritual mean? Our Lord responds to us,
first of all, with the words of St. Paul: “whenever you eat this bread and
drink this cup, you are proclaiming the Lord’s death until he comes” (1Cor. 11:26). And at the moment of the
Institution of the Eucharist Jesus said to his apostles: “Do this in memory of
me”. Indeed, it does appear the keyword
for the understanding of the Eucharist is Memorial/Remembrance. But
memorial of what? Of the death of the Lord, certainly, but not only of this,
Jesus said: “In memory of me”, the
Eucharist, therefore, remembers (brings to heart) Him, all his mystery; His
prefiguration in the Old Testament and his actuation in the New Testament.
The Eucharist is a Remembrance/Memorial of the Lord and the Salvation he
wrought, that culminates in his Death and Resurrection. It is the memorial for the people of God. Every people that has a
history, has also a memorial, which can be a day of feast or something that
condenses the history. The Eucharist is equally a Banquet that unites.
In the verses preceding the passage of the second reading Paul warns: “And so, when you
assemble together as one, it is no longer in order to eat the Lord's Supper.
For each one first takes his own supper to eat. And as a result, one person is
hungry, while another is inebriated. Do you not have houses, in which to eat
and drink? Or do you have such contempt for the Church of God that you would
confound those who do not have such contempt? What should I say to you? Should
I praise you? I am not praising you in this” (11:20-22).
Extrapolating from the passage, we can identify
three important elements in relation to this sublime mystery, namely: ●The substantial change of the bread to the
Body of our Lord Jesus Christ and the wine to his Blood. This is what we refer
to as transubstantiation, as opposed to
transfiguration. ●The element of
thanksgiving, which in Greek is “Eucharistia”. ●The phenomenon of remembrance or memorial. This serves as a reminder to the people of God not to forget the good
deeds of the Lord.
Drawing
the issue further, the three readings of today propel us to consider the Holy
Eucharist above all, from variegated points of view:
►The Eucharist
as a Sacrifice: The Eucharist is above all, the sacrifice that renders the self-immolation of Christ actual and
perennially present. It is the sacrifice of the New covenant ratified with
the Blood of Christ. ●The letter to the Hebrews declares in a definitive manner
the conclusion of the time of the Old law, which was to serve as a preparation
for the coming of Christ and for salvation through faith in Him. The numerous sacrifices with animals gives
way to the unique and perfect sacrifice of Christ, a sacrifice of infinite
value. The blood of animals was replaced with the Blood of the unique and
immaculate victim: Jesus Christ. By means of the replacement with the Blood of
Christ, we are no longer talking about a
provisory covenant, that has to do with the Israelites alone, but a definitive
covenant. It is not just a ritual of external purification, rather the
“purification of our conscience from the works of death to serve the living
God” (Heb. 9:12-14). ●St. Paul in
1Corinthians (11:25) speak
explicitly of the “New Covenant”. The Eucharist, therefore, is the
representation in a sacramental way under the signs of bread and wine, of the
unique and perfect sacrifice of Christ, to the glory of the Father, for the
expiation of sins.
►The Eucharist
as a Banquet: The Eucharist is not only the sacrifice of Christ, but at the
same time, it is a supper, a feast, to which everyone is invited, “the Lord
Jesus took some bread and after he had given thanks he broke it” (1Cor. 11:23). Jesus instituted it in
the context of the Last Supper, with typical elements of a banquet: bread and
wine, and he said clearly and distinctly: “This is my Body” (1Cor. 11:24). “This cup is the new
covenant in my Blood” (1Cor. 11:25).
Indeed, the Eucharistic celebration is
inseparably a sacrifice and a banquet.
►The Eucharist
as a mystery which calls for commitment: The Eucharist is not a mere rite
or a simple cultual act, that is repeated in a formal way. Above all, it is a
mystery that requires a conscious and active participation. It is a mystery
that demands fully the commitment of a believer. The Eucharist as a sacrifice requires
those who participate in it the effort to make themselve a living sacrifice
acceptable to God, to unite their daily sufferings to that of Christ. And
as a banquet, it is a feast around which we gather as children of God, the Eucharist as such, invites us to live
in communion, fraternity and love.
Again to our
earlier question: What does this ritual mean? Our Lord responds to us, first of
all, with the words of St. Paul: “whenever you eat this bread and drink this
cup, you are proclaiming the Lord’s death until he comes” (1Cor. 11:26). At the moment of the Institution of the Eucharist
Jesus said to his apostles: “Do this in remembrance of me” (1Cor. 11:24). Indeed, it does appear the keyword for the
understanding of the Eucharist is Memorial / Remembrance. But memorial of what?
Of the death of the Lord, certainly, but not only of this, Jesus said: “In
memory of me”, the Eucharist, therefore,
remembers (brings to heart) Him, all his mysteries. Drawing the issue
further, here remembrance entails something more than mere recollection. In the context of the Passover, it is God
and not just the people who remembers. As such, He makes present the great
acts of redemption. Similarly, at each
Eucharist, we do not just look back in remembrance of the Last Supper; instead
the Last Supper is made present to us in order that we might experience the
saving power of Jesus. In the Eucharist we both remember and relive what
Jesus has done for us and this great gift of Himself in the Eucharist. It is
worthy of note that in the biblical language, ‘remembrance’ (zikkaron)
rather makes one to relive the reality really; it is a remembrance and a presence at the same time!. The Death and
Salvation of Christ, in the Eucharist, are not relived only in our memory, but
they are relived really even though in an unbloody manner; there is a real presence on the altar. It is the presence of the
Risen Lord who says: “Touch me, it is really I” (Lk. 24:39). (Along history lane some have doubted this, we recall
the Eucharistic miracle of Lanciano (Italy) in the year 700).
Above all
else, however, from what has
been said it is clear that the participation in the Eucharist does not end with
the final blessing, it is to be lived, it must permeate and influence all our
actions. And here we want to consider a Eucharistic experience from three
different but interconnected perspectives: before,
during and after the celebration. In the
‘before’ of the celebration, there are numerous elements that predispose us
to an ever more lively celebration of the sacrament. Before the celebration,
the believer is invited to consider the gratuitousness of the gift that he goes
to celebrate and to recognize himself as a sinner. The ‘during’ is the time of celebration, the space in which the
encounters between one believer and another; the human and the divine take
place. It is a moment of a very strong involvement, of feeling welcomed by God
and the brethren. So, it is also a time of fraternity. It is a time to let
ourselves be given the therapy by the Word of God. It is a time of
confrontation with oneself and the Word, and this attitude holds the secret for
constant growth in Christian maturity. Lastly, the ‘after’ of this encounter with God and with the brothers and
sisters should instill in us a life of communion already anticipated during the
celebration, as an element coming from the encounter with Jesus. What we
celebrate must have spiritual, moral and social values in our life. After the
example of self-donation, sharing and love given to us by Jesus, the ‘after’
celebration must therefore be a time of extension of the Eucharistic experience
in our everyday life. And I would like to conclude with
these profound and piercing words of Don Tonino Bello: “Unfortunately, flashy
opulence makes us easily see the body of Christ in the Eucharist of our altars.
But it prevents us from seeing the body of Christ in the uncomfortable
tabernacles of misery, need, suffering, loneliness. (...) I believe that the
feast of the Body and Blood of Christ demands our conversion. Not the altitude
of our words. Nor the empty pomp of our liturgies.” Truly, Jesus in the
Eucharist continues to demand for our conversion. May He make our presence
before his Presence a transforming encounter. May we become more of Him and
less of us. Amen!!!
Verbum caro factum est!
Verbum panis factum est!
Verbum caro factum est!
Verbum panis factum est!
(Fr. Vitus
Chigozie, SC)