(Homily for the 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time Year A)
The
overriding theme that permeates the readings of this day is the
unveiling of Jesus’ identity, as the Messiah, Son of God and the symbolism of
authority exemplified in the keys given to Eliakim and to Peter and the
change of his name etc. Drawing the issue further, the call and
election of Eliakim in the first reading, the Christological confession of
Peter and the change of his name, portray in a fascinating manner the workings
of God and throw more light on the symbolism of authority and the image of the
Messiah. The question of the identity of Jesus is one of the enigma that the
Gospel, especially that of Mathew, sets out to unravel to his Jewish readers.
In some episodes, questions concerning his identity have been raised: who is
this Man? But in the episode of today’s Gospel Jesus himself takes the
initiative of asking: who do people say I am? And you, who do you say I
am? Even though no human mental assent is able to grasp fully who Jesus
is, just as St. Paul observed while talking about God’s wisdom and knowledge in
the second reading, but Peter was enabled from above. Today therefore,
we reckon with one of the most emblematic and at the same time interesting
question in the Scriptures and in Christianity: Who is Jesus? Who
do people say he is? Who do you say he is? This question, that is
both Christological and existential in nature, will serve as our leading star
in today’s reflection. Thus, we are going to concentrate on the two questions
of Jesus: Who do people say I am? And Who do you say I am? He is the
Living One, so he is still capable and he continues to interrogate us till
today: Who do you say I am?
In
the first reading (Isaiah 22:19-23) we can see the tension
between power and authority as exemplified in the personalities of
Shebna and Eliakim. From the previous verses we understand that Shebna was a
master of the household of the king but he had no right (Is. 22:16).
Hence he could have assumed power by force not by authority. On
account of this, he became overbearing, arrogant and self-conceited. In fact,
he became a disgrace to the master’s house (Is. 22:18). As a result
of his style of leadership and arrogance, God designed his replacement with
Eliakim. The name ‘Eliakim’ means “my God will raise up”. By
implication God raised up His own servant for the house of the king, one on
whom He invested authority to become not just a servant but a father to the
inhabitants of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. Furthermore, he is also
given the keys (v.22) to the house of David and that means
entrances and exits are under him. In ancient times, keys represent authority.
So to be given the keys of a place means to be given authority over that
place. The keys that Eliakim received symbolized authority, which
entails that he was second to the king, he could act as the Prime minister.
An active mind would really wonder why God had to concern himself with the
administration of the household of the King. The answer to this can be seen
written large in the event that took place at Caesarea Philippi shown in the
Gospel. This passage is connected with the Gospel, especially with
reference to Christ acclamation: concerning Peter: “Tu es Petrus”. So
we can say that the event of Eliakim’s elevation prefigured that of Peter. St.
Paul was very clear on the fact that all authority comes from God (cf.
Rm. 13:1), those in authority should also be conscious and
respectful of the fact that their positions are God-given and should
thus carry out their activities with total fear of God and commitment to
service.
The
Gospel of today (Mt.16:13-20) opens up around an unusual
location: the district of Caesarea Philippi which then was a Roman city. One
significant thing about the area is that the city is surrounded by rocks with
Mount Hermon towering with a prominent peak. Our Lord chose this location
to ask his disciples one of the most significant questions: “Who do men say
that the Son of Man is?” The variety of answers showed the different ways
people conceived our Lord Jesus Christ. For some said he was John the Baptist
(the forerunner of the Messiah), some said Elijah, others said Jeremiah or one
of the prophets. It is good to note that the people they likened our
Lord Jesus Christ with were people of high reputation. The episode
that Mathew narrated here is also seen in Mark and Luke, although with
different specifications. Mathew situated the prediction of the passion,
Peter’s protest and Jesus’ rebuke in a separate episode, that followed the
confession. In our present passage, Jesus proclaims Peter blessed and gives him
the name: Petrus, the Rock, followed by a series of promises (the building of
the Church on the foundation of Peter, and the assurance that the powers of
hell shall not prevail against the Church). It is only Mathew that is profound
in his account: “You are the Christ”. In Mark we see only a recognition of
Jesus as Messiah (Mk. 8:29) and not necessarily as the Son of
God. And both Mark and Luke do not say anything about the promise to
Peter (Lk. 9:20).
The
question of the divine identity latently and in a positive formulation started
in the Old Testament when Moses and the Israelites sang the Song of victory:
“Yahweh, who is like you, majestic in sanctity, who is like you among the holy
ones, fearsome of deed, worker of wonders? (Ex. 15:11). And in the
New Testament the question of Jesus’ identity arises in different contexts. In
the Gospel of Mathew the disciples asked: What kind of man is this, that even
the winds and the sea obey him?” (Mt. 8:27). In a similar
episode, the disciples asked: “who can this be? Even the wind and the sea obey
him” (Mk. 4:41). In the Lukan narrative, they exclaimed: “Who can
this be, that gives orders even to winds and waves and they obey him?” (Lk.
8:25). Furthermore, there are many affirmations about the identity of Jesus
in the Bible. St. Paul identified him as “the image of the invisible God” (Col.
1:15). Mark captioned the beginning of his Gospel thus: “The beginning of
the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God” (Mk.1:1), he is the Son of
God. And the centurion affirmed: “Truly, this man is the Son of
God” (Mk.15:39). On the other hand, who does Christ say He is? He
says: “It is I, the first and the Last, I am the Living One. I was dead but
look I am alive forever and ever” (Rev. 1:17-18). In the Gospel of
John we see Jesus’ series of I am: “I am the bread of life” (6:51) “I
am the Good Shepherd” (10:14) etc.
In
the first question: “who do people say I am?”, here ‘people’ refers to men and
women outside, those who have heard about him or seen him, but did not adhere
to Him. So, was Jesus worried about what people think or say of him? No! He
wants to know what people think of him, and they think that he is a prophet,
which is true, but he is more than a prophet. The question only helps us to
find out what people say of him and then propels us to rediscover what we think
and say of Him too. Little wonder, his second question. But situating the
question into our own context: who do the people of our time say he is? The
responses are many. Who do atheists say he is? Who do people of other religions
say he is? And eventually who do you say he is? For some people in our day
and age, Jesus is their protector so apart from protection Jesus does not
exist. For others He is their provider so when there is no issue of provision
Jesus ceases to exist. When God told Moses in Exodus that His name is I
AM…. It was more or less an open check. So one can fill as many things as
what one desires from God. It is not surprising that there are still those
who respond like the people of that time, that he is a prophet, while some see
him as a superman. But he is more than a prophet and a superman. At the second
moment, Jesus turned to his disciples and said: “but you who do you say I
am? He started with “but”, to indicate that their own answer has to be
different. And “you” indicates his disciples and apostles, those who have
followed and known him closely, those who have listened to his words and seen
his prodigious works. It could be noted that in the first question
they could answer in one accord, but in the second, it becomes personalized and
Peter spoke up: “You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God”. The name
Christ is from the Greek word “Christos” meaning the
Anointed one and it is equivalent to the Hebrew “Messiah” which
means Saviour. Peter’s response unlike that of the people reveals the
centrality of his person and mission. Today we still need to answer the
question personally and individually. However, as we can see, between the two
answers there exists a gap. If for the first to answer they had to look around,
to what people say, the opinion of others. Now in the second they have to look
deep within themselves, the answer comes from the inner recesses of man, as he
listens to the voice of God that speaks, because “it is not flesh and blood
that revealed it to you”. I will find the answer to
this question within my heart, and not in some Theological treatise or
any Christological verbalizing. Jesus does not require an exact
answer or a perfect response; instead He wants a sincere response and our
involvement.
Indeed,
Peter’s answer was correct: "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living
God." Come to think of it, it is interesting to note that Peter could give
such a convincing answer, and later on, he would deny and desert the
Christ. Of a truth, most of us can identify with Peter. He knew who
Christ is up in his head, but then it has not yet arrived in his heart. As a
matter of fact, knowing who Jesus is, is not faith, because even Satan
does. It is only when our knowledge passes into action that it becomes
faith. Notwithstanding, Jesus commends Peter, for his answer, and he
affirms that it is the Father who has revealed the truth to him. He then
confirmed Peter as the one on whom he would build his Church. Then, Jesus
poured out trust and promises on Peter. Jesus changes the name
of Simon, as in the bible when one receives a new name it is accompanied by a
new mission: he called him Kefa. However, the true rock is
Jesus himself, the ideal Rock is God Himself (cf. Ps. 18:2; Ps. 144:1),
but Kefa stands for a building stone that forms part of the building. Not only
that, there is also a need for a sign that renders the Corner stone visible and
that will be Peter and his successors (Apostolic succession). In this
passage Jesus installs the petrine ministry. Christ promised Peter: “I will
give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven”, as we earlier opined, keys
represent authority. He told Peter two significant things:
“Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on
earth shall be loosed in heaven”. As evident in this passage, when God calls a
person He gives him or her a new name, which many a times is revelative of a
new mission. Receiving a new name means a change of status, we remember when
Jacob’s name was changed to Israel, Abram to Abraham and Simon to Peter (Kefa).
Have you recognized the name God has given you, do you know who you are called
to be (some are called to be like eagles while they remain fouls that cannot
fly), may be not out of their own making. May your God given name and mission
manifest in your life!
Today
what is important to Jesus is not what people say, but what we, you say, who is
Christ for you? Who is he in your life? It is not enough to parade ourselves as
Christians or to claim to believe in the divinity of Christ, we have to give
testimony to it. I remember Paul Claudel in his book: “The
Humble Father”, a Hebrew blind girl asked her Christian friend, “you that see,
what do you see, what do you use the light for? This we have to ask ourselves
equally today. You that believe in Christ, who is He for you? Jesus needs
our response, we cannot invent answers or responses, rather we need to identify
him through our personal encounter and experience with Him. In fact, till
today, we continue to proclaim our faith in Him as the Christ and the Son of
God, we profess it continually in the Creed of the Church. Through her
teachings and prayers, the Church continues to respect this faith: Jesus
is not only a man, or a prophet, He is more than a prophet, He is God-with-us.
We need to internalize this Peter’s profession of faith and make it ours, else
it becomes insignificant. Interestingly, at the end of the episode Mathew
reported that: “He gave the disciples strict orders not to say to anyone that
he was the Christ” (v.20). This of course, is no longer the case
today. Then, it was necessary that the apostles maintain the “messianic
secret”, because the people have not been prepared to receive the message.
Contrarily, today Jesus orders us to tell all that He is the Christ, especially
to the people who continue to ask: who is Jesus of Nazareth? We have a
mandate of professing our faith in Him and making Him known.
The
second reading (Rm. 11:33-36) presents the mysterious ways God
intervenes in the history of humanity, the way he leads us to discover the
identity of Jesus. Upon seeing this Paul exclaimed “how rich are the depths of
God, how deep his wisdom and knowledge”. In this passage, we see the
wonderful doxology that succeeds Paul’s discussion of the place of Israel in
the history of salvation. Beginning from the ninth chapter to the eleventh
chapter of his letter to the Romans, St. Paul tried to reflect and theologize
about the ways and workings of God in salvation history. However, he accepted
his inadequacy before the profundity of God’s wisdom: “How rich are the depths
of God-how deep his wisdom and knowledge and how impossible to penetrate his
motives or understand his methods”. Indeed, the peak of his
consideration is that no one can know the mind of God. No matter how hard
we try, our knowledge of God remains inadequate, and any claim to know
him in toto demeans His omnipotence. Today therefore, Paul not only presents to us the
greatness of the wisdom of God, but also His sovereignty over all creation. It
is in knowing him that we can appreciate his greatness.
Extrapolating from the Gospel
passage, we may well affirm that by his answer, Peter made a personal
commitment to Christ. And Jesus said, “Blessed are you, Peter”. He called Peter
the rock of faith and appointed him the cornerstone of the Church, and gave him
the keys of the kingdom. But it might interest you to know that Peter did
not always act as good as he talked and here lies the challenge of the
Christian faith and its proclamation. Peter was human as we are, so he had
his weaknesses and fragility as well. But no doubt, Peter loved Jesus.
Irrespective of his frailties and doubts, each time Peter failed, he picked
himself up. We are like Peter, although in different degrees, that is why we
need the sacrament of reconciliation. Conscious of our own frail conditions,
let us ask the Messiah, the Son of God in our midst to make of us small rocks
for the edification of His Church and a new humanity. Amen!
(Fr. Vitus Chigozie, SC)