(Homily 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time Yr-A)
The
overriding theme that permeates the readings of this day is the
unveiling of Jesus’ identity, as the Messiah, Son of God and the symbolism of
authority exemplified in the keys given to Eliakim and to Peter and
the change of his name etc. Drawing the issue further, the call and
election of Eliakim in the first reading, the Christological confession of
Peter and the change of his name, portray in a fascinating manner the workings
of God and throw more light on the symbolism of authority and the image of the
Messiah. The question of the identity of Jesus is one of the enigma that the
Gospel, especially that of Mathew, sets out to unravel to his Jewish readers.
In some episodes, questions concerning his identity have been raised: who is
this Man? But in the episode of today’s Gospel Jesus himself takes the
initiative of asking: who do people say I am? And you, who do you say I
am? Even though no human mental assent is able to grasp fully who Jesus
is, just as St. Paul observed while talking about God’s wisdom and knowledge in
the second reading, but Peter was enabled from above. Today therefore,
we reckon with one of the most emblematic and at the same time interesting
question in the Scriptures and in Christianity: Who is Jesus? Who
do people say he is? Who do you say he is? This question, that is
both christological and existential in nature, will serve as our leading star
in today’s reflection. Thus, we are going to concentrate on the two
questions of Jesus: Who do peopel say I am? And Who do you say I am? He
is the Living One, so he is still capable and he continues to interrogate us
till today: Who do you say I am?
In
the first reading (Isaiah 22:19-23) we can see the tension between power and
authority as exemplified in the personalities of Shebna and Eliakim.
From the previous verses we understand that Shebna was a master of the
household of the king but he had no right (Is. 22:16). Hence he
could have assumed power by force not by authority. On account of this, he
became overbearing, arrogant and self-conceited. In fact, he became a disgrace
to the master’s house (Is. 22:18). As a result of his style of
leadership and arrogance, God designed his replacement with Eliakim. The
name ‘Eliakim’ means “my God will raise up”. By implication God raised up His
own servant for the house of the king, one on whom He invested authority to
become not just a servant but a father to the inhabitants of Jerusalem and to
the house of Judah. Furthermore, he is also given the keys (v.22) to
the house of David and that means entrances and exits are under him. In ancient
times, keys represent authority. So to be given the keys of a place means to be
given authority over that place. The keys that Eliakim received
symbolized authority, which entails that he was second to the king, he
could act as the Prime minister. An active mind would really wonder why God had
to concern himself with the administration of the household of the King. The
answer to this can be seen written large in the event that took place at
Caesarea Philippi shown in the Gospel. This passage is connected with
the Gospel, especially with reference to Christ acclamation: concerning Peter:
“Tu es Petrus”. So we can say that the
event of Eliakim’s elevation prefigured that of Peter. St. Paul was very clear
on the fact that all authority comes from God (cf. Rm. 13:1), those
in authority should also be conscious and respectful of the fact that their
positions are God-given and should thus carry out their activities
with total fear of God and commitment to service.
The Gospel of today (Mt.16:13-20) opens
up around an unusual location: the district of Caesarea Philippi which then was
a Roman city. One significant thing about the area is that the city is
surrounded by rocks with Mount Hermon towering with a prominent peak. Our
Lord chose this location to ask his disciples one of the most significant
questions: “Who do men say that the Son of Man is?” The variety of answers
showed the different ways people conceived our Lord Jesus Christ. For some said
he was John the Baptist (the forerunner of the Messiah), some said Elijah,
others said Jeremiah or one of the prophets. It is good to note that
the people they likened our Lord Jesus Christ with were people of high
reputation. The episode that Mathew narrated here is also seen in Mark and
Luke, although with different specifications. Mathew situated the prediction of
the passion, Peter’s protest and Jesus’ rebuke in a separate episode, that
followed the confession. In our present passage, Jesus proclaims Peter blessed
and gives him the name: Petrus, the Rock, followed by a series of promises (the
building of the Church on the foundation of Peter, and the assurance that the
powers of hell shall not prevail against the Church). It is only Mathew that is
profound in his account: “You are the Christ”. In Mark we see only a
recognition of Jesus as Messiah (Mk. 8:29) and not necessarily
as the Son of God. And both Mark and Luke do not say anything about the promise
to Peter (Lk. 9:20).
The
question of the divine identity latently and in a positive formulation started
in the Old Testament when Moses and the Israelites sang the Song of victory:
“Yahweh, who is like you, majestic in sanctity, who is like you among the holy
ones, fearsome of deed, worker of wonders? (Ex. 15:11). And in the
New Testament the question of Jesus’ identity arises in different contexts. In
the Gospel of Mathew the disciples asked: What kind of man is this, that even
the winds and the sea obey him?” (Mt. 8:27). In a
similar episode, the disciples asked: “who can this be? Even the wind and the
sea obey him” (Mk. 4:41). In the Lukan narrative, they exclaimed:
“Who can this be, that gives orders even to winds and waves and they obey him?” (Lk.
8:25). Furthermore, there are many affirmations about the identity of Jesus
in the Bible. St. Paul identified him as “the image of the invisible God” (Col.
1:15). Mark captioned the beginning of his Gospel thus: “The beginning of
the gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God” (Mk.1:1), he is the Son of
God. And the centurion affirmed: “Truly, this man is the Son of
God” (Mk.15:39). On the other hand, who does Christ say He is? He
says: “It is I, the first and the Last, I am the Living One. I was dead but look
I am alive forever and ever” (Rev. 1:17-18). In the Gospel of John
we see Jesus’ series of I am: “I am the bread of life” (6:51) “I
am the Good Shepherd” (10:14) etc.
In
the first question: “who do people say I am?”, here ‘people’ refers to men and
women outside, those who have heard about him or seen him, but did not adhere
to Him. So, was Jesus worried about what people think or say of him? No! He
wants to know what people think of him, and they think that he is a prophet,
which is true, but he is more than a prophet. The question only helps us to
find out what people say of him and then propels us to rediscover what we think
and say of Him too. Little wonder, his second question. But situating the
question into our own context: who do the people of our time say he is? The
responses are many. Who do atheists say he is? Who do people of other religions
say he is? And eventually who do you say he is? For some
people in our day and age, Jesus is their protector so apart from protection
Jesus does not exist. For others He is their provider so when there is no issue
of provision Jesus ceases to exist. When God told Moses in Exodus that
His name is I AM…. It was more or less an open check. So one can fill as
many things as what one desires from God. It is not surprising that there
are still those who respond like the people of that time, that he is a prophet,
while some see him as a superman. But he is more than a prophet and a superman.
At the second moment, Jesus turned to his disciples and said: “but you who do
you say I am? He started with “but”, to indicate that their own answer
has to be different. And “you” indicates his disciples and apostles, those
who have followed and known him closely, those who have listened to his words
and seen his prodigious works. It could be noted that in the first question they could answer in one accord, but in
the second, it becomes personalized and Peter spoke up: “You are the Christ, the Son of the Living God”. The name
Christ is from the Greek word “Christos” meaning the
Anointed one and it is equivalent to the Hebrew “Messiah” which
means Saviour. Peter’s response unlike that of the people reveals the
centrality of his person and mission. Today we still need to answer the
question personally and individually. However, as we can see, between the two
answers there exists a gap. If for the first to answer they had to look around,
to what people say, the opinion of others. Now in the second they have to look
deep within themselves, the answer comes from the inner recesses of man, as he
listens to the voice of God that speaks, because “it is not flesh and blood
that revealed it to you”. I will
find the answer to this question within my heart, and not in some
Theological treatise or any Christological verbalizing. Jesus does not
require an exact answer or a perfect response; instead He wants a sincere
response and our involvement.
Indeed,
Peter’s answer was correct: "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living
God." Come to think of it, it is interesting to note that Peter could give
such a convincing answer, and later on, he would deny and desert the
Christ. Of a truth, most of us can identify with Peter. He knew who
Christ is up in his head, but then it has not yet arrived in his heart. As a
matter of fact, knowing who Jesus is, is not faith, because even Satan
does. It is only when our knowledge passes into action that it becomes
faith. Notwithstanding, Jesus commends Peter, for his answer, and he
affirms that it is the Father who has revealed the truth to him. He then confirmed
Peter as the one on whom he would build his Church. Then, Jesus poured out
trust and promises on Peter. Jesus changes the name
of Simon, as in the bible when one receives a new name it is accompanied by a
new mission: he called him Kefa.
However, the true rock is Jesus himself, the ideal Rock is God Himself (cf.
Ps. 18:2; Ps. 144:1), but Kefa stands for a building stone that forms part
of the building. Not only that, there is also a need for a sign that renders
the Corner stone visible and that will be Peter and his successors (Apostolic
succession). In this passage Jesus installs the petrine ministry.
Christ promised Peter: “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven”, as
we earlier opined, keys represent authority. He told Peter two significant
things: “Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever
you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven”. As evident in this passage, when
God calls a person He gives him or her a new name, which many a times is
revelative of a new mission. Receiving a new name means a change of status, we
remember when Jacob’s name was changed to Israel, Abram to Abraham and Simon to
Peter (Kefa). Have you recognized the name God has given you, do you know who
you are called to be (some are called to be like eagles while they remain fouls
that cannot fly), may be not out of their own making. May your God given name
and mission manifest in your life!
Today what is important to Jesus
is not what people say, but what we, you say, who is Christ for you? Who is he
in your life? It is not enough to parade ourselves as Christians or to claim to
believe in the divinity of Christ, we have to give testimony to it. I
remember Paul Claudel in his book: “The Humble Father”, a
Hebrew blind girl asked her Christian friend, “you that see, what do you see,
what do you use the light for? This we have to ask ourselves equally today. You
that believe in Christ, who is He for you? Jesus needs our response, we
cannot invent answers or responses, rather we need to identify him through our
personal encounter and experience with Him. In fact, till today, we continue to
proclaim our faith in Him as the Christ and the Son of God, we profess it
continually in the Creed of the Church. Through her teachings and prayers, the
Church continues to respect this faith: Jesus is not only a man, or a
prophet, He is more than a prophet, He is God-with-us. We need to
internalize this Peter’s profession of faith and make it ours, else it becomes
insignificant. Interestingly, at the end of the episode Mathew reported that:
“He gave the disciples strict orders not to say to anyone that he was the
Christ” (v.20). This of course, is no longer the case today. Then,
it was necessary that the apostles maintain the “messianic secret”, because the
people have not been prepared to receive the message. Contrarily, today Jesus
orders us to tell all that He is the Christ, especially to the people who
continue to ask: who is Jesus of Nazareth? We have a mandate of
professing our faith in Him and making Him known.
The second reading (Rm.
11:33-36) presents the mysterious ways God intervenes in the history
of humanity, the way he leads us to discover the identity of Jesus. Upon seeing
this Paul exclaimed “how rich are the depths of God, how deep his wisdom and
knowledge”. In
this passage, we see the wonderful doxology that succeeds Paul’s discussion of
the place of Israel in the history of salvation. Beginning from the ninth
chapter to the eleventh chapter of his letter to the Romans, St. Paul tried to
reflect and theologize about the ways and workings of God in salvation history.
However, he accepted his inadequacy before the profundity of God’s wisdom: “How
rich are the depths of God-how deep his wisdom and knowledge and how impossible
to penetrate his motives or understand his methods”. Indeed, the peak
of his consideration is that no one can know the mind of God. No matter how
hard we try, our knowledge of God remains inadequate, and any claim to know
him in toto demeans His omnipotence. Today therefore, Paul not only
presents to us the greatness of the wisdom of God, but also His sovereignty
over all creation. It is in knowing him that we can appreciate his greatness.
Extrapolating
from the Gospel passage, we may well affirm that by his answer, Peter made a
personal commitment to Christ. And Jesus said, “Blessed are you, Peter”. He
called Peter the rock of faith and appointed him the cornerstone of the Church,
and gave him the keys of the kingdom. But it might interest you to know
that Peter did not always act as good as he talked and here lies the challenge
of the Christian faith and its proclamation. Peter was human as we are, so
he had his weaknesses and fragility as well. But no doubt, Peter loved Jesus.
Irrespective of his frailties and doubts, each time Peter failed, he picked
himself up. We are like Peter, although in different degrees, that is why we
need the sacrament of reconciliation. Conscious of our own frail conditions,
let us ask the Messiah, the Son of God in our midst to make of us small rocks
for the edification of His Church and a new humanity. Amen!
(Fr.
Vitus M.C. Unegbu, SC)
No comments:
Post a Comment