Friday, 25 September 2020

Sincere “No” Rather Than Insincere “Yes”!

(Homily 26th Sunday in Ordinary Time Yr-A)

     The conscience of personal responsibility seems to be central and predominant in the readings of today. To the Babylonian exiles who accused God of injustice, God says “Is what I do unjust? Is it not what you do that is unjust? When the upright abandons uprightness and does wrong and dies, he dies because of the wrong which he himself has done. Similarly, when the wicked abandons wickedness to become law-abiding and upright, he saves his life” (Ez. 18:25b-27). Everyone is responsible for his or her actions and inactions. Jesus teaches us in the Gospel, what true personal responsibility is, and it is manifested not merely in speaking (words), but majorly in action, as the parable reveals. In the second reading, St. Paul gives us the example of Christ, an example of responsibility and coherence, the Yes of Christ is an operative one, incarnated in actions (works) for the realization of His mission and our Redemption. The three readings set out to teach us that man is free in his choices and, therefore, he is accountable for his actions. So, the exiles of Babylon ought to have assumed responsibility and repented for their actions, instead they murmured and accused God of acting unjustly. So also, the chief priests and elders of the people because John came to show them the way of salvation, and they neither believed nor repented. Instead, the publicans and the prostitutes responded to the preaching of John with repentance and faith. For this Jesus said “the tax collectors and the prostitutes are going into the Kingdom of God ahead of you” (Mt. 21:31).  

     The first reading (Ez. 18:25-28) presents the intervention of Prophet Ezekiel in the bid to correct the erroneous conception of his contemporaries. Among the major prophets of the Old Testament, Ezekiel is known for his insistence on individual responsibility for sin. For as a matter of fact, in the history of Israel the value of communal living is a paramount cultural heritage, to the extent that a man is hardly distinguished from his community. At the heart of this cultural value was communal solidarity, and as such individual guilt was believed to have corporal consequences. For this prophet Ezekiel vehemently warned that “the soul that sins shall die” (Ez. 18:20). And speaking about individual responsibility the prophet equally foresaw the possibility of an individual turning from wickedness to righteousness and vice versa. In his words, “when the upright abandons uprightness and does wrong and dies, he dies because of the wrong which he himself has done” (Ez.18:26). However, a person is judged by the new life to which he has turned to, and no longer by the previous life. Be that as it may, the prophet opposed this erroneous idea vigorously: God does not punish the sons for the sins of the fathers or the fathers for the sins of the sons, everybody will be held responsible for his or her actions. Everyone has the possibility to be saved, if only the person wants, God’s continuous mercy and forgiveness to repentant sinners is a proof. The Good News of Ezekiel is that we are not slaves to our past sins. He affirms that we can shake off our past and form new habits; a change of life is possible: “when the wicked man abandons wickedness…Having chosen to renounce all his previous crimes, he will most certainly live, he will not die” (vv. 27-28).

     The responsorial psalm (Ps. 25) brings to light the consciousness of an individual aware of his own sins, but relying on God’s mercy. Interestingly, the first reading and the psalm view a man’s life divided into the past and the future in the present moment. While the past maybe characterized by sin, the future is filled with hope for spiritual maturity. Indeed, the refrain to the psalm “Remember your mercies, O Lord” (Ps. 25:6) calls our attention to an important biblical conception of “remembrance” (“ricordare” : bringing to heart), and when God brings to heart, when He remembers, it is not merely a recalling of an event of the past, rather He brings it out from the past and makes it effective in the present.

     In today’s Gospel (Mt.21:28-32) Jesus brought to the fore the need for the conscience of personal responsibility and responsible freedom, with the parable of the two sons. The parable exposes the Jewish leaders who pledged obedience to God but reneged on their promises, whereas the tax collectors and public sinners, who at first refused keep the commands of God are now been converted by the preaching of John the Baptist. The second son represents the High priests, the elders and the Jews, that claim to have impeccable character, but rejected God’s call to conversion, and to faith for salvation. They say “yes” in words, but in action “no”. Their act is irresponsible. But the first son, who represents the publicans, prostitutes and pagans, lived in an irresponsible way in his relation with God in the past, but even though he said “no” with his words, now with his work of adherence and conversion, has started responding “yes” to God. His previous irresponsibility has been purified through his present responsibility. And in these two categories of people we see the bisection of conventional and anonymous Christians. For in the eyes of God, the past does not count much, even though it is important and merits consideration. More important is the present, our responsible yes daily.

     This passage is equally suggestive of an appeal to repentance and conversion addressed to backsliders in faith and the so called conventional Christians. For some of us today, our situation as Christians really reflects that of the second son that said Yes, but never accomplished it, conventional and nominal Christians. Whereas the reality of the first son is reflective of the situation of those that have turned to Christ in adherence to His words, and these could be called in the parlance of Karl Rahner: anonymous Christianity. As a matter of fact, from all indications Jesus must have told this parable to vindicate his proclamation of the Good News of the Kingdom of heaven against those who were criticizing him, “the tax collectors and prostitutes who receive me now will enter into the Kingdom of heaven at the last judgment rather than you, who criticize me for welcoming them”. Indeed, at the heart of this parable is the proclamation of God’s mercy to sinners, His unending mercy.

     In the parable of the two sons, Jesus illustrated the importance of the personal responsibility and collaboration in one’s salvation. Jesus used this parable equally to correct the erroneous and unhealthy claims of the Jews, in particular the Pharisees, who considered themselves as the privileged people of God, the chosen people, thus holding tight to the privileges of the past, without a present effort, they are like the son that said yes to the father. There are also all others, the pagan, the publicans and sinners, those who initially said no to God but later accepted the message of salvation. Jesus rebuked the Pharisees and Jews for their pretentious behavior and maintained that it is not enough to be children of Abraham or to hold on to the past privileges. Salvation is a personal thing, and one makes the decision depending on the attitude he assumes before God and before the Good News of Christ.  God’s salvation is for all, it is not a patrimony of a particular set of people, but to all who accept the Word of life proclaimed by Jesus and live accordingly. Even though God’s design is for all to be saved, but there is need for a personal consistent choice, we need to work out our salvation with fear and trembling (cf. Phil. 2:12), unfounded familiarity cannot save. Indeed, the words of John the Baptist to  the Pharisees and Sadducees speak volume on this, “do not presume to tell yourselves, “We have Abraham as our father,” because, I tell you God can raise children for Abraham from these stones” (Mt. 3:9). God has offered salvation for all men and women; it now depends on the free response of each person.

     Furthermore, Jesus insisted on another aspect: that is on the concreteness of one’s response. “It is not anyone who says to me, “Lord, Lord,” who will enter the kingdom of Heaven, but the person who does the will of my Father in heaven” (Mt. 7:21). It is not the one who is contended with mere sentiments and unfounded affiliation, but he who translates daily into concrete gestures and actions his believe and adherence to God. This is why the son who said no at first and later carried out the will of their father is preferred to the one who said yes but did not fulfill his yes. Jesus calls us in our daily decisions to let our actions reflect our Christian values. It is a call to imbibe the value and principle of orthopraxy: right believing and right living. The theme of personal responsibility which is predominant in today’s readings, especially the first reading and the Gospel, emphasizes that even though our salvation is the work or the gratuitous gift of God for man, however, it requires our human collaboration and freedom. Little wonder, St Augustine will say that “the God who created you without you, will not save you without you.” The CCC puts it thus: “God created us without us: but he did not will to save us without us.” Therefore, we need to express our human freedom making effort daily to convert from evil to good. No one should be blocked irremediably in his or her past life.

     This parable should inspire us to action, for a sincere examination of conscience, how true are we to our profession of faith in God? Do we accompany the Yes we say to God with concrete actions or our Yes is empty, unbelievable and devoid of obedience of faith? How are we making effort daily to maintain and concretize the Yes we have said to God at Baptism? To which of the sons do we identify ourselves more with? Brethren, the risk is grave because if we undermine the daily concrete effort of living out our calling and filial identity, our Yes will be inauthentic. In fact, as St. Peter would have it, “Instead of this, brothers, never allow your choice or calling to waver; then there will be no danger of your stumbling, for in this way you will be given the generous gift of entry to the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2Pt. 1:10-11). The words of Jesus: “tax collectors and prostitutes are making their way into the kingdom of God before you” (v.31), should spur us on to reflect deeply on our manner of life. We are therefore called to a life of synthesis between words and actions!

     In the second reading (Phil. 2:1-11) we see the great Christological hymn. The hymn presents Christ as a model and it concentrates on ethical exhortation. As such, Christ becoming our model, we are therefore expected to live as Christians distinguished by unity, love, humility and consideration for others. By so doing, we manifest the same attitude that Christ showed when he humbled himself to become man and to accept death on the cross. According some exegetes we have to be careful while interpreting this passage, so that Christ will not just be seen merely as an external example, for he is the source of redemptive life. St. Paul offers us wonderful suggestions that will help us to express authentically our free adhesion to God’s plan of salvation manifested to us in Christ. Let us make the words of the apostle a program of life this week and beyond: “be of a single mind, one in love, one in heart and one in mind. Nothing is to be done out of jealousy or vanity; instead, out of humility of mind everyone should give preference to others, ‘everyone pursuing not selfish interests but those of others” (vv.2b-4). St. Paul shows us in Jesus Christ, an eloquent example of total coherency and responsibility before God, His Father. A perfect synthesis between words and actions! His “yes” of words is never different from his “yes” in action. Little wonder, St. Paul exhausts us to have “the same sentiments that were in Christ Jesus” (Phil. 2:5) whose life and existence were a unified “yes” to the Father’s will. In the words of Jesus “My food is to do the will of the one who sent me and to complete his work” (Jn.4:34; cf. Heb. 10:7).  

     In all, as it is suggestive of today’s message we cannot but remember the words of Paul VI: “the modern man listens more willingly to witnesses than to teachers, and if he does listen to teachers, it is because they are witnesses” (Evangelii Nuntiandi, 41), those who are heralds and doers of what they preach. And I would like to add, that every authentic Christian should be able to synthesize these two dimensions in his or her life of faith, that is the spheres of word and actions, for sometimes, the gap between our words and actions may plunge us into spiritual and moral schizophrenia. Therefore, the story of the two sons in the Gospel calls our attention for a deeper and personal reflection, “intus legere”, to read inwardly; to read ourselves from within to know where we fall, whether within the tendencies of the first son or that of the second son. Do my words and profession of faith reflect in my actions? We manifest our love and adherence to Him when we put His words into practice. Jesus says: “If you love me, keep my commandments” (Jn. 14:15). Lord Jesus we thank You for standing as a model for us, in the call to authentic Christian living. Give us abundance of your Grace to be able to live a coherent and sincere life, in adherence to your words. Help us to bridge the gap between what we say and what we do. May our existence as Christians be that of an eloquent synthesis between words and actions. Amen!!!

(Fr. Vitus M.C. Unegbu, SC) 

No comments:

Post a Comment

His Kingdom Will Have No End!

  (Homily for the Solemnity of Christ the King, Year B)      Existentially speaking, today we live in hard and distressing times. We are ...