(Homily for the 2nd Sunday of
Lent Yr. A)
It
will not be out of place to underline the theme of Vocation as the most
evocative theme in today’s readings. The theme of God’s call, vocation
dovetails into the three readings in different degrees. And by inference, we
can equally say that this theme is in connection with the theme of faith, which
is the human response to the divine call. Therefore, our message today revolves around the theme of God’s call and man’s
response orchestrated by faith. And the locus of this as manifested in the
first reading and the Gospel is an unknown land where Abraham goes for the
realization of his divine mission and to the Mountain of Transfiguration, where
Jesus called his three apostles the second time and on that mountain his divine
salvific mission was revealed. In the
first reading, we see the episode of the call of Abraham, where God invited him
to leave his country and go to an unknown land. In the Gospel passage, Jesus
took three of his apostles to Mount Tabor and revealed himself to them in a
unique and divine experience, his
Mission as New Moses, New Elijah and the Son of God. Lastly, in the second
reading St. Paul reminded his disciple Timothy and all Christians the holy call
we received from God, which has to be the source of trust in the power of God,
to the point of suffering for the Gospel.
The first reading (Gen. 12:1-4a) evocates the acts of God in the history of mankind,
for often theologians speak of the mighty acts of God in history. But many a
times one may ask: how can we conceive today a God who acts in human history?
Indeed, our passage from the book of Genesis is suggestive of one of the ways
God acts in history. God intervenes and
acts in human history by calling some vital individuals and establishing a
covenant with them, and it is through these human responses that a channel
for the execution of God’s designs is manifested in the world. At first, God
tried with Adam and Eve, but it ended on a sad note (cf. Gen.3). Afterwards, He entered into covenant with Noah and his
descendants (cf. Gen.9:9-11). Again,
after Noah, there was need of establishing a new covenant and constituting a
new people of God, for this God called Abraham to enter into covenant with him.
In order to realize his will, many a times God enters into a close rapport with
man, in a rapport characterized by call and response. It is under this interpretative key that we can understand better, God’s
gesture and the obedient gesture of Abraham. Abraham in obedience left his
country and set out for an unknown country, and it is as a result of that, that
God made him, a great nation and a blessing to all the nations of the world.
When the Lord calls, he attaches a promise. In Abraham we see an expression of
an authentic human response to God’s call, a call that was addressed to a
series of key individuals, starting from Abraham and culminating in and with
the person of Jesus Christ and his apostles. It is on the basis of the above,
that St. Paul used Abraham as the paradigm of faith. Faith in this panorama is
conceived as an obedient response to the call of God, which opens up channels
and avenues for the redemptive actions of God in the history of mankind.
For Abraham the voice of the Lord was expressed with the words we heard
in the first reading: “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s
house.” Abraham was at peace with his people, he was happily married with Sara
and probably desiring to be surrounded by his own children and to enjoy his old
age. But God wanted him out of that comfort zone! Behold, the mysterious voice
of the Lord came to him: “Go from…” It is indeed humanly speaking a painful
command, but on the part of God it is not for deception, because what God promised him is greater than what
he asked of him (Abraham): “In you all the families of the earth shall be
blessed”, And we were told that “Abraham went as the Lord told him.” This
movement in the life of Abraham is a maximum expression of faith, little
wonder, so many years after that event, he is still considered as “Our father
in faith.” God called him and sent him to an unknown destination, and he
responded trusting in the Lord, even though he was unaware of what awaits him. He made a qualitative leap of faith!
The call of God necessitates an “es tasis”, that is an exodus from
oneself, it is a radical self-emptying. It
is the abandonment of all the human securities: country, house, affection and
material means. And the only
security and guarantee given is God’s word, his faithfulness and his promises.
A great lesson from Abraham is that: faith is all about trusting God even when
you don’t comprehend his plans and where he is leading you to.
The Gospel passage (Mt. 17:1-9) presents the event of Jesus’ transfiguration. And as a
matter of fact, it is not by chance that we are called to reflect on this event
at this particular time in the liturgical season of the church, because the
transfiguration looks forward in anticipation to the Passion and subsequent
glorification of Jesus at the Resurrection event. St. Mathew situates the event
of the Transfiguration in the part of his Gospel where he speaks about the
revelation of the Messiah (13:53-17:27);
the solemn proclamation by Peter: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living
God” (16:13-20) and lastly after the
proclamation of the Passion (16:21-28).
The word transfiguration simply means change of
figure, and symbolically, it is an anticipation
of the resurrection. Put in another way, it means giving up the present
figure and obtaining another one. Thus, he transfigured before them or he
changed in appearance. In the Transfiguration of Jesus we see rays of Jesus’ divinity, which
was somewhat hidden by his humanity, he offered us an anticipation of his future
glorification and demonstration that his death on Calvary will not be the end,
there is the resurrection, death will not have the final word!
In his narrative, Mathew provides a number of
fascinating factors: ●Mathew and Luke unlike Mark mentioned about the change of
Jesus’ face and countenance respectively, “his face shone like the sun” (v.2). ●Only Mathew compared the
whiteness of Jesus’ garments to light (v.2).
The splendour of his face and the whiteness of the garments indicate the glory
of God manifested in Jesus. ●Moses and Elijah are the two of the most important
figures in the Old Testament, Moses represents the law that Jesus has come to
bring to fulfilment, while Elijah represents the prophecies that Jesus has come
to realize. He is therefore the Promised
Messiah. Jesus is the New legislator who will give men a unique commandment and
the synthesis of all other commandments: love, and as the new prophet who
will proclaim to men the secrets of the heart of his Father. Thus as the new
Moses and new Elijah he will realize his vocation and manifest the love of the
Father. ●What
was the content of his discussion with Moses and Elijah? Only St. Luke opined
that Moses and Elijah were speaking “of his exodus, which he was to accomplish
in Jerusalem” (Lk. 9:31), that is,
his Passion. ●Mathew like the
other synoptic reported the voice that came from the cloud saying: “This is my
beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased,
listen to him.” The content of the message of the voice of the Father is a
revelation that in terms of what Jesus
does (his works) he can be compared to Moses and Elijah, but at the level of being he is more than
them, because he is the Son of God! Secondly, we are all invited to listen to
him, listening to him entails following his examples and threading the paths he
has charted for us. And truly Abraham in the first reading shows us by an
existential example what it means to listen to God, which is equivalent to
trusting in his word and abandoning oneself in Him. The voice of the Father from the clouds reveals who Jesus is: “This is
my Son.” God the Father reveals that Jesus is not only a man, He is also God. The context of the transfiguration event is a place where God declared
the mission of the Son: “This is my beloved Son, listen to him”. After the Father’s voice, Jesus readily climbed down from the
mountain of glory to the valley of human predicament and suffering. While
he was coming down from the mountain Jesus ordered his disciples not to talk
about the transfiguration until after his resurrection. ●In Mathew, there was a command of silence
until after the resurrection. Mathew reported this command, Mark said: ‘he
charged them”, but Luke omitted it. Why this command? It is because it will lack logicality, if
the transfiguration is disclosed before the death and resurrection that would
imply glory without the cross. At the
heart of this narrative is the age-long assertion: “No cross, no crown”.
Indeed, let us imagine the scenario at Tabor,
before the apostles: Peter, James and John, and the vision of the transfigured
Lord. It was indeed an atmosphere of glory
and indescribable peace that made them to be bewildered and overwhelmed.
Then out of bewilderment and fear, Peter spoke up: “It is wonderful for us to
be here.” They wanted to remain there.
Peter went as far as coming up with a concrete step on how to realize that
dream or project: “I will make three booths.” At the heart of that event, Mathew tells us that the disciples were
afraid, and Jesus intervened and calmed their fear with his reassuring touch
and voice. As a matter fact, the
Scriptures portray fear as man’s reaction to a theophany. “When I saw him,
I fell at his feet as though dead, but he laid his right hand on me and said,
Do not be afraid…” (Rev. 1:17). And
this fear was conquered only by the encouraging word of Jesus (cf. Mt. 14:27; 28:5, 10). Jesus came
and touched them, saying; “Rise, and have no fear”, and they began to walk down
to plain ground. There is a human
tendency to remain in a place considered to be a comfort zone, just like the
three apostles, even though they were afraid, but the mountain at that
point became a comfort zone and they wanted to remain there to enjoy the
tranquillity mountain and the “divine
display”. They wanted to remain in the mere vision of glory, but Jesus led them down to the plain ground
where he has to face his destiny on the Cross, where they will see the real
glory, not a vision. Many a times, we are also like the apostles who
desired to remain on mount Tabor, without realizing the necessity of passing
through Calvary.
What
are those places and environments in your life that you have declared: “it is
wonderful to be here”, of course, with the desire to remain there? Examine those moments and places very well
and see if they lead you to your destiny, to your goal, to your dreams and
aspirations in life, or they will only cause a spiritual abortion to the
realization of your dreams. It is really true that sometimes the Lord
leaves us in such places or environments for sometimes and he comes later very
close to us to say: “Rise, do not be afraid.” In fact, in the destiny of every man or woman, especially of every Christian,
there is a Tabor, a place, a situation from which he or she has to climb down
in order to climb the Calvary, to arrive at a real glory not a mere vision.
Therefore, we all make this experience, but what makes the difference is the
attitude of each person. Here, the disciple of Jesus has to distinguish himself
or herself from a non-believer. How? By and through the response he or she
gives to that invitation of Jesus: “Rise”, not just rise, but rise and move
down towards the realization of your goal. Drawing the issue further, the transfiguration of Jesus is a sign and
a prophecy of what will become of us one day. Our Christian life is tailored in
being and becoming, between reality and hope, between the already and the not
yet. Our being, our reality or our already is in Christ. Little wonder, the
apostle reminds us: “You are in Christ Jesus” (1Cor. 1:30).
In
the second reading (2Tm. 1:8b-10)
St. Paul picks up the theme of the divine call and narrowed it down to the
Christian calling. He emphasized that the call is by no means based on human
merits, instead upon God’s purpose and design. Interestingly, this age long divine purpose has now been
fulfilled and manifested in the person of Jesus Christ, who brought life and
immortality to light. This wonderful presentation of Jesus as one who
brought life and immortality into light introduces us to and situates us well
into the context of the Gospel passage on the theme of Transfiguration.
Above
all friends, the message of the today’s readings reminds us that we are pilgrims, like Abraham, moving
toward the land of promise. But our own
pilgrimage is an inward pilgrimage. Just as God called Abraham, so he has
called each of us. Though he may not call us exactly like Abraham to “your
country and your father’s house” but he
calls us to leave behind our old ways, greed, insincerity and selfish desires.
Indeed, the direction of this
existential pilgrimage is not geographical but moral: is a journey towards
love, kindness and obedient to God’s word. Our own Promise Land is Heaven. Thus,
in this season of Lent, the Church reminds us of this journey and calls us to
conversion, the Church calls us in reality to repent and appropriate the
experience of Abraham and that of the apostles on Tabor. In concrete terms we are called to accomplish three symbolic tasks or
movements: to go from, to go down and to go. ●To go from: from the daily routines of life, from our Ur of the Chaldeans,
where we are comfortable and relaxed: our comfort zone. ●To go: towards the land that the Lord will indicate, that is,
towards the future of faith, opening oneself to the promises of God. In that
episode, the land that God indicated to Abraham was the Promised Land,
Palestine. But for us our own Promise Land is the kingdom of God, not just the
kingdom of God after death, but already here in our midst. ●To go down: from Tabor entails going
courageously towards God’s will, following the Lamb wherever he goes (cf. Rev.14:4). We need to embark on this existential and spiritual movement. The
three apostles wouldn’t have arrived at the joy of the Resurrection, if they
had remained on Tabor. Likewise us we cannot experience the glory of the Lord
if we do not follow Him courageously, even when it means sacrificing our
comfort zones, the things and persons that make us feel good.
We cannot but remember the experience of Joseph, if someone who loved
him wanted to show him favour, the person would have taken Joseph back to his
Father, and not to Pharaoh, but the throne would have been aborted, he would
have died, Jacob would have died, and that would have been the end of Israel.
But Joseph needed to go to Pharaoh for the realization of his mission and no
longer back to his father. “Pharaoh said to Joseph, I hereby make you governor
of the whole of Egypt” (Gen. 41:41).
And at the end, through the names given
to his children he vehemently discovered God’s blessings and favour in disguise:
“Joseph named the first-born Manasseh,
Because, he said, ‘God has made me completely forget my hardships and my
father’s house’” (Gen. 41:51); “He
named the second Ephraim, Because he
said, ‘God has made me fruitful in the country of my misfortune’” (Gen. 41:52). The path way to favour and blessing is not always positive and
pleasing, many a times it comports pains and sacrifice. Abraham had to
leave his father’s land and family, the three apostles had to follow Jesus and
go down from Tabor, even though it was a wonderful place for them. Therefore,
you too need to make a move. Go! Do not be afraid!
(Fr.
Vitus M.C. Unegbu, SC)
No comments:
Post a Comment